I wrote a LinkedIn article after being inspired by Joost Icke's original piece. Johan Cruijff had some amusing sayings but also had a very deep understanding of team performance as a system.
Yesterday, two of my favourite bloggers go into a spat on Mastodon: @tante accused Cory Doctrow of 'straw-manning' the anti-slop/Luddite movement in a blog . Later that day, after a 'that escalated quickly' argument that is usually reserved for x.com, tante published another blog to address the reactions to the original piece. At first glance, this looks like a ' straw-motte ' discussion - a bait-and-switch tactic that content creators use to capture attention: accusing an offside remark of being a straw man, then building an stone-clad counter argument (a motte), which is then accused by the original party of being a straw man, countered with a motte, which is a straw man, etc. ad-infinitum. But on closer inspection, it turned out that there was quite a nuanced discussion going on - that is, beside the usual flame war. The discussion went as follows: Doctrow mentioned in a blog that he uses an LLM to clean up his content. In the blog...
About a year ago, I went to a training given by Sandra Bouckaert and Lydie van de Laar on the basics of Deep Democracy . My wife was 35 weeks pregnant and I was working on a project with worryingly limited financing so I was not exactly in the perfect 'zen' mindset for a day of mind-battering brainstorming. I expected to leave the day dazed and confused, yet found myself in the car buoyed up and even excited about what I had just experienced. Deep Democracy is a method developed in South Africa at the end of the apartheid regime and specializes in getting minority views heard. It is concurrently a team-building tool and an ideation tool.
The Company to Consumer model under threat teambrunel.com Originally I became interested in agile software development when I started to discover a pattern between great teamwork in yacht racing and teams that produced software. Some of the greatest software teams that I worked with were people working together on open source projects. Thousands of people worked together in self-organizing teams throughout their technology stack, much as if they had belonged to a single organization. Could that model work in more organizations? There was an essential thing missing though - most of these teams were making things that were useful to themselves but not necessarily to a user who would be willing to pay. Motivation was often very idealistic: working on free (as in liberty) software usually entailed working for free (as in beer). Some projects became wildly successful, imagine a world without Linux , Wikipedia or Bitcoin . But do you remember Joomla , M...
Comments
Post a Comment